Posted by Maju on January 29, 2011 in archaeology, fox, Upper Paleolithic
January 31, 2011 at 6:15 pm
Foxes had religious significance as the Mesopotamian polytheistic religion, in Greek fables, and figured in lore as far back as anyone can discern in every indigenous culture from Finland to Japan (with the coyote having parallel significance in the New World), so it would have been quite a coup for a priet or shaman to have a semi-tame fox.Lots of the Japanese mythology of foxes forming bonds with humans involve injured foxes that are nursed back to health by a human. Perhaps this was something like that.
January 31, 2011 at 6:34 pm
Sounds plausible. I only knew the fox had mythology among Sahel peoples but nice to known. However, explaining this that way is like explaining dogs on wolf mythology: it lacks something – after all mythology is just talk about real life in a poetic way.So I could equally say that all those myths only talk about real people befriending animals… in a poetic way. It's what you consider primary: the heart or the tongue (to borrow a metaphor from ancient Egyptian mythology). All Yavihstic, and maybe also Hinduism-derived, religions emphasize the word but I'd say that what really matters is the heartbeat. Words are just stories, songs… about the heartbeat, along the heartbeat and because of the heartbeat.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)